Stent having adjacent elements connected by flexible webs

ABSTRACT

A stent incorporating flexible, preferably polymeric, connecting elements into the stent wherein these elements connect adjacent, spaced-apart stent elements. Preferably the spaced-apart adjacent stent elements are the result of forming the stent from a helically wound serpentine wire having space provided between adjacent windings. Other stent forms such as multiple, individual spaced-apart ring-shaped or interconnected stent elements may also be used. The connecting elements are typically web-shaped and result from creating slits or apertures in a covering of graft material applied to the stent and then, for example, applying heat to cause the slits or apertures to enlarge. The remaining graft material forms the interconnecting webs between the adjacent stent elements.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 61/020,544, filed on Jan. 11, 2008.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of implantable stents havingflexibly connected adjacent stent elements.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The use of implantable stents in the vasculature and other body conduitshas become commonplace since first proposed by Dotter in the 1960's.These devices are required to have a small, compacted diameter forinsertion into an intended body conduit and transport, typically via acatheter, to a desired site for deployment, at which site they areexpanded to a larger diameter as necessary to fit interferably with theluminal surface of the body conduit. Balloon expandable stents areexpanded by plastically deforming the device with an inflatable balloonon which the expandable stent was previously mounted in the compactedstate, the balloon being attached to the distal end of the catheter andinflated via the catheter. Self-expanding stents are forcibly compactedto a small diameter and restrained at that diameter by a constrainingsleeve or other means. Following delivery to a desired site fordeployment, they are released from the restraint and spring open tocontact the luminal surface of the body conduit. These devices aretypically made from nitinol metal alloys and typically rely on thesuperelastic and biocompatible character of this metal. Nitinol stentsthat rely on the shape memory attributes of that material are alsoknown.

The evolution of implantable stents has also included the use of atubular covering fitted to the stent, either to the outer surface, theluminal surface or to both surfaces of the stent. These covered stentshave generally come to be referred to as stent-grafts. The coverings aregenerally of a polymeric biocompatible material such as polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). See, for example,U.S. Pat. No. 4,776,337 to Palmaz.

The Palmaz '337 patent also describes that the covering may beoptionally provided with perforations if desired for particularapplications. Because of the open area provided by the perforations,such devices having perforated coverings may be considered to be a sortof hybrid stent and stent-graft, as are devices that include stentframes having metallic stent elements and polymeric elements connecting,covering or other otherwise being attached to the stent elements. Thepresence of the polymeric elements reduces the otherwise open spacebetween the adjacent metallic stent elements, either very slightly orvery substantially depending on the intended application and mechanicaldesign. Perforated stent-grafts are also described elsewhere; see, forexample WO00/42949.

Stents having stent elements provided with polymeric coatings orcoverings are also known; see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,892 toMyers et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,091 to Pinchuk et al.

Generally, a fully covered stent-graft can be considered to have asurface area (hereinafter A_(max)) equal to the outer circumference ofthe expanded stent multiplied by the length of the stent. For aconventional, open frame stent (as opposed to a stent-graft), thesurface area represented by all of the stent elements is only a smallportion of the maximum surface area A_(max). The actual surface areacovered by the stent, meaning the area covered by all components of thestent (including connecting elements) in their deployed state, isA_(stent). The porosity index, or P.I., describes the open area (theportion of the maximum surface area not covered by all components of thestent assembly) as a percentage of maximum surface area, wherein:P.I.=(1−(A _(stent) /A _(max)))×100%.

A preferred method of measuring the actual surface area covered by thestent (A_(stent)), involves the use of a machine provided VisiconInspection Technologies, LLC (Napa, Calif.). The Visicon Finescan™ StentInspection System (Visicon Finescan machine model 85) uses a 6000 pixelline scan camera to generate a flat, unrolled view of a stent. Inoperation, the stent is mounted on a sapphire mandrel with a finediffuse surface. This mandrel is held under the linear array camera androtated by the system electronics and is used to trigger the lineararray camera to collect a line of image data in a precise line-by-linemanner. After a complete revolution an entire image of the stent isacquired. When the entire stent has been imaged, the softwaredifferentiates between the stent with cover and the background. Thetotal number of picture elements (pixels) is compared to the totalnumber of pixels associated with the stent and cover to determineA_(stent). Basic settings on the machine used for this type ofdetermination are (for example): light, 100%; exposure, 0.3 ms/line;gain, 5; threshold, 50; noise filter, 20; smoothing, 4.

The open area may be a continuous single space, such as the spacebetween windings of a single helically wound stent element. Likewise theopen area may be represented by the space between multiple individualannular or ring-shaped stent elements. The open area may also berepresented by the total area of multiple apertures provided by either asingle stent element (e.g., as shown by FIGS. 1B and 2B of U.S. Pat. No.4,776,337 to Palmaz) or by multiple stent elements providing multipleapertures. If multiple apertures are provided they may be of equal orunequal sizes. The use of a perforated graft covering or of polymericelements in addition to metallic stent elements may also reduce the openarea.

Stents having a porosity index of greater than 50% are considered to besubstantially open stents.

In addition to the porosity index, the size of any aperture providingthe open area must be considered if it is intended to cover only aportion of a stent area for a specific stent application. For multipleapertures, often the consideration must be for the largest size of anyindividual aperture, particularly if the apertures are to provide for a“filtering” effect whereby they control or limit the passage of biologicmaterials from the luminal wall into the flow space of the body conduit.

Various stent devices combining metallic stent elements with polymericconnecting elements are known; see, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,507,767to Maeda et al. Another is a stent provided with a flexible knittedsleeve having small open apertures in the fashion of chain link fencing,from InspireMD Ltd. (4 Derech Hashalom St., Tel Aviv 67892 Israel).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An open stent (a stent having open space through its thickness atlocations between the ends of the stent) and method of making aredescribed. The stent incorporates flexible, preferably polymericconnecting elements (i.e., polymeric webs) into the stent wherein theseconnecting elements connect adjacent, spaced-apart stent elements. Theflexible, preferably polymeric connecting elements provide a means forkeeping the stent elements equally spaced and allow the construction ofa stent having good flexibility and a useful resistance to forces thatmay be applied to the device in vivo such as torsional forces, bendingforces, axial tension or compression, or radial compression.

Preferably the spaced-apart adjacent stent elements are in the form of ahelically wound serpentine wire having space provided between adjacentwindings. Other stent forms such as multiple, individual spaced-apartring-shaped stent elements may also be used. Ring shaped stent elementsmay be in the form of zig-zag elements creating a circumferential ring,or interconnected elements that provide diamond shaped openings in acircumferential sequence when the device is diametrically expanded.Alternatively, embodiments presented that utilize the helically woundserpentine forms are preferred for many applications. The stent ispreferably self-expanding (made from materials such as nitinol) but mayalso be made from materials suitable for balloon expandable stents(e.g., stainless steel, magnesium based alloys, magnesium, cobaltchromium alloy, titanium or titanium based alloys).

Helically wound stent frames are inherently unstable in absence of asecondary linkage connecting adjacent rows. Utilization of the describedpolymer web linkage to interconnect adjacent rows stabilizes the helicalstructure and limits axial elongation, torsion and bending whileallowing a high degree of flexibility.

The adjacent, spaced-apart stent elements are preferably substantiallycircumferentially oriented, meaning that they have a general directionof orientation perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the stent, whenthe stent is in a straight, unbent state.

A method of making involves the application of a biocompatible polymericcovering to the chosen stent form to create, temporarily, a stent-graft.The covering is preferably of a strong and thin material and may be in atubular form, although sheet forms (e.g., relatively wide films cut intonarrow tapes) are preferred for manufacturing as will be described. Thecovering is preferably applied to the outer surface of the stent, butmay be applied only to the luminal surface, or alternatively may beapplied to both the luminal and abluminal (outer) surfaces of the stent.Covering both the luminal and abluminal surfaces allows for thepossibility of covering substantially all of the metallic surfaces ofthe stent with the desired polymer. The polymeric film covering ispreferably a thermoplastic film, and preferably a film with strengthproperties that result in relatively uniform directional shrinkingproperties when the film is subjected to heat above its melt point. Thefilm-covered stent graft is provided with punctures (slits or otherapertures) through the thickness of the film, preferably at locationsbetween adjacent stent elements as will be further described. Thepunctured stent-graft is then exposed to heat above the melt temperatureof the film which causes the film to shrink back from the edges of thepreviously created puncture, resulting in openings through the wall ofthe stent. These openings are of size, shape, quantity and orientationthat are a result of the size, shape, quantity and orientation of thepreviously created punctures, the amount of heat subsequently appliedand the thickness and type of polymeric film used. It is apparent thatthese are manufacturing variables that may be controlled as desired. Theresulting open area of the stent (i.e., porosity index) may cover a widerange (i.e., 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%,or higher, or between any of these percentages). The remaining polymericfilm following the heating step is in the form of polymeric websextending between the adjacent stent elements.

An alternate method of making also involves the application of abiocompatible polymeric covering to the chosen stent form to create,temporarily, a stent-graft. A preferable stent form in this instancewould be ring shaped stent elements made from a suitable balloonexpandable material. The covering is similar to that describedpreviously and may be applied to the chosen stent form similarly to themethods described in the previous section. The polymeric film coveringis preferably a thermoplastic film, and preferably a film withunidirectional strength properties. The film-covered stent graft isprovided with punctures (slits or other apertures) through the thicknessof the film, preferably at locations between adjacent stent elements aswill be further described. The punctured stent graft is then exposed toheat sufficient to bond the film to the stent form. When the resultingstent is diametrically expanded, these openings are of size, shape,quantity and orientation that are a result of the size, shape, quantity,and orientation of the previously created punctures. It is apparent thatthese are manufacturing variables that may be controlled as desired. Theresulting open area of the stent (i.e., porosity index) may cover a widerange such as previously described. The remaining polymeric filmfollowing the puncturing/slitting step is in the form of polymeric websextending between and interconnecting the adjacent stent elements.

Further, the finished open frame stent may optionally be provided withanother covering of polymeric graft material to create a stent-graft ifdesired. This graft covering is easily adhered or bonded to the coveringor coating that is provided over the stent elements (e.g., the wire) andforms the interconnecting webs.

The polymeric covering of these finished devices (that include amultiplicity of openings and a multiplicity of polymeric interconnectingwebs) is generally continuous or substantially continuous between thestent ends, being the result of having been made from a continuous sheetof film or the result using helically wrapped polymeric tape withoverlapping adjacent edges that are melt-bonded together. The filmcovering that forms these continuous webs is well adhered to the stentelements.

Still further, these devices may be provided with coatings (preferablyelutable coatings) of various therapeutic agents (e.g., heparin) byvarious means known in the art that are suitable to the particularagent.

Stents made as described herein have good conformability enabled by theflexible interconnecting webs between adjacent stent elements thatprovide flexibility and anatomic apposition. They also have goodflexural durability enabled by interconnecting webs between adjacentstent elements that mitigates fracture due to cyclic longitudinalbending in curved anatomies. The expandable device is scalable toaccommodate a range of vessel sizes (e.g. 3 mm-55 mm).

The potential clinical applications of the expandable device describedherein include but are not limited to: congenital defects (i.e.,pulmonary artery stenosis, aortic coarctation), adjunctive aortictherapy (i.e., Type I endoleaks; aortic side branch stenting),peripheral artery disease (i.e., renal and iliac artery stenosis,aneurysm, and dissection) and venous applications.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B describe respectively a perspective view and a plan viewof a helically wound serpentine wire form (previously known) of apreferred stent as described herein.

FIG. 2A is a side perspective view of a portion of a helically woundserpentine wire stent provided with flexible interconnecting websbetween adjacent stent elements.

FIG. 2B is a flattened, plan view of the stent of FIG. 2A.

FIGS. 2C and 2D are plan views wherein each single opening shown by FIG.2B is replaced by multiple apertures, specifically four openings in FIG.2C and six openings in FIG. 2D.

FIG. 3 is a scanning photomicrographs of a multiaxial ePTFE film usefulfor making the described open frame stent.

FIG. 4 shows a side view of a partially completed stent provided withslits or punctures that are part of the process of manufacturing thedevice.

FIGS. 5A-5C show transverse cross sectional views of a stent element asit may appear for a finished stent made as described herein.

FIG. 6A is a side perspective view of a balloon expandable stent (or alength portion of such a stent) provided with flexible interconnectingwebs between adjacent stent elements.

FIG. 6B is a side perspective view of three stent rings shown withoutthe interconnecting polymeric covering.

FIG. 6C is a side perspective view of the stent assembly comprising thestent rings shown in 6B provided with the interconnecting polymericcovering.

FIG. 6D is the upper left section of the stent assembly described byFIG. 6C, shown as a perspective detail.

FIG. 7 is a side perspective view of a balloon expandable stent (or alength portion of such a stent) provided with flexible interconnectingwebs between adjacent stent elements.

FIG. 8 is a schematic side view of stent as it would appear when mountedon a balloon for subsequent deployment and expansion.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

It has been noted that a variety of stent forms may be usefully providedwith the flexible connecting elements taught herein. FIG. 1A shows aperspective view of a stent 10 that is preferred for use as describedherein. The stent 10 shown comprises a helical winding of a length ofserpentine wire 18. Sequential windings of the helical wound serpentinewire 18 result in spaced-apart adjacent stent elements 12. The ends 17of wire 18 may be secured by any suitable method (e.g., welding) to theadjacent helical winding. For clarity, stent 10 is shown with a mandrel16 extending through and beyond both ends of the stent lumen, making theside closest to the viewer visually apparent while blocking the view ofthe side of stent 10 furthest from the viewer. Mandrel 16 is presentonly for clarity of visualization and is not a part of stent 10.

The helically wound serpentine wire 18 extends continuously betweenopposing ends of stent 10, wherein opposing apices 22 a and 22 b formedof wire bends of relatively small radii are interconnected by straightor relatively straight wire segments 24. The apices typically “point” indirections that are substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis 19of the mandrel 16 and the tubular form of the stent 10, with alternatingapices 22 a and 22 b pointing in opposite directions, that is, pointingto opposite ends of the stent. As shown by FIG. 1A, it is preferred thatapices pointing in one direction (e.g., apices 22 a) are aligned along afirst common line while the apices pointing in the opposite direction(e.g., apices 22 b) are aligned along a second common line that isparallel to the first common line.

FIG. 1B shows a plan (or flattened) view of details of the serpentinewire form described by FIG. 1A; dimensions relate to the method ofmaking described below. Dimension 27 is considered as the height(amplitude) of adjacent opposing apices while dimension 28 is the widthof adjacent opposing apices. Dimension 29 describes one full period ofthe serpentine form. Wire diameter 25 and bend radius 26 of the apices22 may be chosen as appropriate.

FIG. 2A is a side perspective view of a portion of the length of anopen-frame stent 10 wherein spaced-apart, adjacent stent elements 12(e.g., two adjacent apices 22 a connected to opposing apex 22 b) areinterconnected by a pair of flexible polymeric webs 32. FIG. 2B shows aflattened plan view of this same construction. Openings 34 exist betweenadjacent aligned apices 22 a; the particular single openings 18 aregenerally in the shape of a guitar pick. If one drew a line through thecenter of the length of an individual, randomly selected web (i.e.,extending between the adjacent wire apices joined by that web), thatline would preferably form an angle of between 15 and 75 degrees withrespect to a line parallel with the centerline of the stent (or parallelwith the centerline 19 of mandrel 16 shown in FIG. 1). Said otherwise,for this type of stent with elements interconnected by flexible webs 32,the webs 32 preferably are oriented at an angle to the length of thestent.

The enlarged portion of FIG. 2B shows how these flexible polymeric webs32 are narrower at the middle of their length than at the ends wherethey are attached to the stent element (e.g. the nitinol wire). It alsoshows how the webs 32 preferably merge tangentially into the stentelement where they are joined to and attached to the stent element.

FIGS. 2C and 2D are plan views wherein each single opening shown by FIG.2B is replaced by multiple apertures, specifically four openings in FIG.2C and six openings in FIG. 2D.

While various polymeric films may be suitable for use as the stentcovering (or coating) material for this device, combinations of FEP(fluorinated ethylene propylene) films used in combination with ePTFEfilms are preferred. The preferred ePTFE films for use with thesehelically wound serpentine wire stents are films having multiaxialfibrillar orientations as shown by the scanning electron photomicrographof FIG. 3. It is seen how the fibrils are oriented in all directionswithin the plane of the ePTFE film. ePTFE films of this type may be madeas taught by U.S. Pat. No. 7,306,729 and US Published Patent Application2007/0012624 to Bacino et al. Films of this same type may optionally beprovided with a partial covering of a thin layer of FEP (having openingsthrough the FEP film covering; i.e., a discontinuous covering). FEPcoated ePTFE films, with either a discontinuous (porous) FEP covering(coating) or a continuous (non-porous) FEP covering (coating) may bemade generally as taught by U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,892 to Myers et al.

FIG. 4 shows a partially finished stent 13 of helically wound serpentinewire provided with a first outer (abluminal) covering of FEP film and anadditional covering of multiaxial ePTFE film, wherein longitudinallyoriented slits 41 have been made through the film between adjacentapices of the wire that are pointed in the same direction. Heat will beapplied to the device having the multiple slits 41, causing the films toshrink back toward the adjacent wire stent elements, subsequentlyresulting the openings in the finished stent 15 (FIG. 2A). This processis described in further detail below.

While, as noted, various types of films may be used for the stentcovering, the described ePTFE films is preferred because of itsmultiaxial (within the plane of the film) strength orientation. It isstrong, thin, and has excellent biocompatibility. When suitable heat isapplied following slitting, the film will retract (shrink back) withgood uniformity to create the openings through the polymeric stentcovering and to create the flexible polymeric interconnecting websbetween adjacent stent elements.

The flexible interconnecting webs 32 that result from this processtypically are of wider width at their end points where they connect withthe wire apices and are of comparatively narrower width in the middle oftheir lengths between the apices that they interconnect. Additionally,there may be a very thin, vestigial edge (36, FIG. 2B) of film thatextends outwardly away from the wire 18 in the straight portions 24 thatconnect the apices in the same helical winding (i.e., apices 22 a and 22b). FIG. 5A shows a transverse cross section of the wire with this edge(taken at section 5 indicated in the plan view of FIG. 2B) that showsthe general appearance of the edge for a single layer of graft materialapplied to either the outer or inner surface of the stent. FIGS. 5B and5C show the transverse cross section as it would appear for a coveringapplied to both the inner and outer surfaces of the stent element.

A preferred method of making a flexible stent is as follows. A stainlesssteel mandrel of diameter equal to about the inside diameter of theintended stent is obtained. The surface of the mandrel is provided witha helical wrapping of a 1″ wide tape of Kapton® Polyimide Film (DuPont,0.002 inch thickness). A stent of the desired length and diameter madeof helically wound serpentine nitinol wire is provided (wire diameter asdesired). This is then wound around the Kapton covered surface of themandrel. The end of the stent wires are secured to an adjacent windingof the stent wire using an FEP thread tied with a securing knot. Theapices of the serpentine wire are aligned so that apices pointing in acommon direction are aligned with and parallel to the longitudinal axisof the mandrel. The stent is then helically wrapped with a covering of asingle layer of FEP tape that has been cut from FEP film (0.00015 inchthickness and about 0.75 inch width), stretched tight over the outersurface of the stent with minimal overlap of adjacent edges of the FEPtape. This FEP tape is then cigarette wrapped (wrapped in a directionperpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the mandrel) with an ePTFEfilm of the type described previously. This wrapping may be started byaligning a transverse edge of the film with the longitudinal axis of themandrel and attaching it to the underlying FEP film by carefullymelt-bonding the ePTFE film edge to the FEP using a heat source such asa clean soldering iron or appropriate equivalent. Six layers of theePTFE film are wrapped around the outer surface of the stent and thefilm edge is trimmed along the length of the stent (i.e., parallel tothe longitudinal axis of the mandrel). The film edge is secured with thepreviously-used heat source.

Longitudinal slits 41 are created between adjacent wire apices that arepointed in the same direction as shown by FIG. 4. These slits may becreated by any suitable means, including the use of a scalpel blade,water jet, laser, etc. One such suitable laser is a Coherent Inc.,Model: GEM-100A, CO₂, CW (continuous wave only), Santa Clara, Calif. Thelast row of apices at each end of the stent may be omitted from slittingif it is desired to leave these end rows covered in their entirety(i.e., in stent-graft fashion). The entire length of the wrapped stentis then provided with an additional, temporary helical wrap of theKapton tape; the ends of this tape may be secured to the surface of themandrel beyond each end of the stent with a mechanical clip or othertemporary fastener. This layer of Kapton is then tightly wrapped with atemporary helical wrap of ePTFE tape (made from an ePTFE film having afibrillar microstructure with fibrils oriented predominately parallel tothe length of the tape and wrapped with a small pitch angle so that theorientation is primarily circumferential with respect to the mandrel).This ePTFE tape will provide circumferential compression to theunderlying materials when suitably heated.

The above construction is them placed into a suitable convection ovenset at 380° C. for 11 minutes, after which it is removed from the ovenand allowed to cool to approximately ambient temperature. The outerlayers of ePTFE film and Kapton tape are then removed. The resultingcoated stent and underlying layer of Kapton tape are then carefullyremoved from the mandrel. The remaining layer of Kapton tape may then beremoved from the stent using a suitable tool such as small forceps ortweezers. Remaining film edges protruding beyond the ends of the stentmay then be carefully trimmed in a transverse direction close to the endapices of the stent wire with a scalpel blade.

FIG. 6A shows a perspective view of a balloon expandable stent 60, as itappears following diametrical expansion with a balloon that is preferredfor use as described herein. The stent 60 shown comprises rings 62wherein the balloon-expanded stent elements form multiple diamond-shapedopenings 63 d; stent 60 is typically comprised of one or more of theserings 62. The individual rings 62 may be constructed by any suitablemeans known in art but are preferably fabricated from a laser cut tube.For clarity, only the side of the tubular stent 60 closest to the vieweris shown. Stent 60 is provided with a polymeric covering 66, preferablyof a flexible film. It is apparent how covering 66 interconnects themultiple rings 62 to create stent 60, via webs 32 that span the distancebetween apices 22 a and 22 b of adjacent rings 62.

While various polymeric films may be suitable for use as the stentcovering (or coating) material for this device, combinations of FEP(fluorinated ethylene propylene) films used in combination with ePTFEfilms are preferred. The preferred ePTFE film for this device is auni-axial film having higher strength in one direction, with thedirection primarily aligned with the longitudinal axis 61 of the stentprior to balloon expansion. This type of film is similar to thatdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,589. A further preference would be tomodify the film with an application of a discontinuous coating of FEPsimilar to that taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,565.

The arrangement of stent rings 62 are shown in FIG. 6B without polymericcovering 66 as the rings 62 would appear prior to balloon expansion.Unexpanded stent rings 62 are cut to have openings 63 which becomediamond shaped openings 63 d when expanded (as shown in FIG. 6A). Stentrings 62 are placed in proximity to one another with apices 22 a and 22b in a typical apex to apex alignment. It is apparent that the distancebetween adjacent rings 62 may be as desired.

FIG. 6C illustrates the stent rings 62 as shown previously in FIG. 6Bwith the addition of interconnecting polymeric covering 66. Webs 32,each a portion of polymeric covering 66, are shown to interconnectadjacent rings 62. FIG. 6D is an enlarged detail perspective view of theupper left end of stent 60 described in FIG. 6C.

Also shown in FIGS. 6C and 6D are punctures or slits 68 arranged inpolymeric covering 66 along the longitudinal axis of stent 60. FIGS.6B-6D show the multiplicity of openings 63 and 64 formed betweenadjacent stent elements of stent rings 62. Slits 68 through polymericcovering 66 are formed of size and shape to generally correspond withthe multiplicity of openings 63 and 64 in each stent ring 62. Theseslits 68 may be formed by various means as previously described. Slits68 are formed through the polymeric covering 66 that covers openings 63that extend between opposing apices 22 a and 22 b (openings that areenclosed between the ends of each stent ring 62). Alternate openings 64that extend from the middle of the length of each stent ring 62 andfully to the end of each stent ring 62 (i.e. between radially adjacentapices 22 a and 22 a, and likewise between radially adjacent apices 22 band 22 b) are also provided with slits through the covering polymericmaterial 66. These slits 68 extend longitudinally between adjacent rings62 and into the corresponding opening in the adjacent ring 62. Theseslits 68 collectively create individual interconnecting webs 32. Slits68 may be of width as desired; the width of a scalpel blade may bedeemed sufficient even though the figures show that width of slit 68corresponding to the width of the underlying stent openings 63 and 64.

The apices 22 a and 22 b of each ring 62 may be made to point toward oneanother as shown in FIG. 6A or may be arranged to be offset as shown inFIG. 7 (i.e. aligned peak-to-valley as shown in FIG. 7 as opposed tobeing aligned in peak-to-peak fashion as shown in FIGS. 1A through 2D,FIG. 4 and FIG. 6A). The apices typically “point” in directions that aresubstantially parallel to the longitudinal axis 61 of the tubular formof the stent 60.

FIG. 8 is a schematic side view of stent 60 as it would appear mountedon a balloon (not shown) for subsequent deployment and expansion. Stent60 is preferably axially compressed during mounting so thatInterconnecting webs 32 are bowed or wrinkled so that stent 60 isforeshortened. The advantage of mounting stent 60 in this fashion isthat, during balloon expansion, stent rings 62 will foreshorten as theyare deformed (with openings 63 becoming diamond shaped openings 63 d).For example, this allows for less than 10% shortening with a greaterthan 6 times diametrical expansion. Bowed webs 32 may be tucked underadjacent stent ring 62 if it is preferred that they do not protrudeoutwardly. A preferred balloon is a balloon that expands diametricallyfrom the middle of its length toward its opposing ends. Alternatively,stent rings 62 at the ends of stent 60 may be made of a thicker materialthan ring 62 positioned closer to the middle of the length of stent 60.These alternatives result in the application of tension during expansionto bowed webs 32 thereby pulling the slack out of them, increasing theirlength and compensating for foreshortening of rings 62 to maintain thelength of stent 60.

A preferred method of making a stent such as a stent shown in FIGS. 6Athrough 7 is as follows. Standard diamond pattern geometry stents werelaser machined and electro-polished at Laserage Technology Inc,Waukegan, Ill. from a 316 LVM stainless steel tube measuring 4.19 mmdiameter×0.38 mm wall thickness, available from Norman Noble, ClevelandOhio. The stents were exposed to a surface roughening step to improveadherence without degrading fatigue durability performance. Plasmatreatment of the stents was performed prior to FEP powder coating forpurposes of cleaning and reducing contact angle of the metal surface.Plasma treatment was performed as commonly known in the arts.

FEP powder (Daikin America, Orangeburg N.Y.) was applied to the stentcomponent by first stirring the powder into an airborne “cloud” in astandard kitchen-type blender and suspending the frame in the clouduntil a uniform layer of powder was attached to the stent frame. Thestent component was then subjected to a thermal treatment of 320° C. forapproximately three minutes. This caused the powder to melt and adhereas a coating over the stent component. Each ring was coated a secondtime while suspending it from the opposite end and placed in 320° C.oven for 3 minutes then removed and allowed to cool to room temperature.

Seventeen layers of a thin ePTFE film provided with a discontinuouscoating of FEP as previously described was then wrapped around astainless steel mandrel measuring approx 3.43 mm. The film is appliedwith its high strength orientation parallel to the longitudinal axis ofthe stent and with the FEP side facing out. Individual stent rings wereplaced over the film tube and aligned. In this case, the stent ringswere aligned apex to apex and separated evenly with a gap of about 2.5mm between each ring to achieve an overall device length of about 40 mm.An additional 17 layers of the same film was applied as previouslydescribed except with the FEP side oriented down, toward the outerdiameter of the stent.

The entire assembly was wound with several layers of an ePTFE thread(Part # SO24T4, WL Gore, Elkton, Md.) to impart compressive forces tothe underlying construct. The assembly was placed in 320° C. oven(Grieves, Model MT1000, The Grieve Corporation, Round Lake, Ill.) forapproximately 40 minutes. The stent assembly was removed and allowed tocool to room temperature. The over-wrap was then removed and the slitswere created and excess material was removed.

While particular embodiments of the present invention have beenillustrated and described herein, the present invention should not belimited to such illustrations and descriptions. It should be apparentthat changes and modifications may be incorporated and embodied as partof the present invention within the scope of the following claims.

We claim:
 1. A stent comprising a length of helically wound serpentinewire extending continuously between opposing ends of the stent whereinmultiple revolutions of the wire about a longitudinal axis of the stentresult in a generally tubular form, said serpentine wire incorporating aplurality of apices along the length of the wire that are orientedalternately to point toward opposite ends of said stent, with a spacebetween adjacent revolutions of the helically wound serpentine wirewherein one revolution has a first apex that is oriented to point to oneend of said stent, and an adjacent revolution has two adjacent apicesthat are oriented to point toward the opposite end of the stent whereinfirst apex points between the two adjacent apices, wherein the firstapex is interconnected by a pair of film webs to the two adjacentapices, wherein the film webs serve to limit axial elongation of thestent, and wherein the film webs have a length extending between theapices that they interconnect and wherein the film webs are of narrowerwidth at the middle of their length than at ends of their length.
 2. Astent comprising a length of helically wound serpentine wire extendingcontinuously between opposing ends of the stent wherein multiplerevolutions of the wire about a longitudinal axis of the stent result ina generally tubular form, said serpentine wire incorporating a pluralityof apices along the length of the wire that are oriented alternately topoint toward opposite ends of said stent, with a space between adjacentrevolutions of the helically wound serpentine wire wherein onerevolution has a first apex that is oriented to point to one end of saidstent, and an adjacent revolution has two adjacent apices that areoriented to point toward the opposite end of the stent wherein firstapex points between the two adjacent apices, wherein the first apex isinterconnected by a pair of film webs to the two adjacent apices,wherein the film webs serve to limit axial elongation of the stent,wherein the first apex, the two adjacent apices and the pair of filmwebs define an aperture having first and second opposing ends, whereinsaid stent includes a multiplicity of said apertures, and wherein thefirst end of the aperture is of greater width than the second end.